Search | NURSECOMPACT

Layout 1

Near # Items Items sample Mean Mean time Mean Item Cut Failing Failing # items size PTBis Pvalue (secs) Difficulty Score Pretest Pretest MC Anchors 97 495 0.11 0.60 59.8 -0.47 50.5% 28 28.9% FBC 92 491 0.14 0.76 174.8 -1.41 12.0% 12 13.0% FBS 8 489 0.07 0.43 116.6 0.37 12.5% 3 37.5% MC 824 490 0.08 0.68 54.5 -1.04 30.8% 394 47.8% MR 88 489 0.08 0.24 71.2 1.50 18.2% 40 45.5% MC Anchors 15 560 0.11 0.58 63.7 -0.38 46.7% 2 13.3% FBC 12 549 0.21 0.67 170.4 -0.72 41.7% 1 8.3% MC 101 556 0.10 0.66 59. ...

InFocus_Vol1_2023.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

Panelists then assign their second-round ratings, which again are aggregated into a single measure reflecting the work of the entire panel. Notably, the modified Angoff method was designed for what are known as dichotomous items, i.e., items where a response is either right or wrong. However, one of the changes associated with the Next Generation NCLEX is the adoption of partial credit (or polytomous) scoring for many of the items. As such, NCSBN integrated two additional standard-setting methodologies designed for polytomous items: the option Angoff, which was used in the first round, and the extended Angoff, which was used in the second round.

Transcript_2019DCM_JHansen.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

I just want to point out this handy-dandy little thing. They put this in a couple iterations ago in our nursys.org. If you haven't used it yet, it's real handy. Up in the top menu bar, you'll see it says, "View in Nursys.com.Go to the Public License site." If you click on that, it'll just take you to what it looks like for the public. So if you're working on a case and you want to know what it's looked like for the public, you don't have to go search for them and get on a different thing, you can just click on that, and it will open it right up for you.

transcript_2024lpp_dbrown.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

So let's talk about innovation. Another commonality between Thomas Jefferson and nursing. As a guide at Monticello, I notice that with all the cleverness on display, from the unique design of the house itself, the house, by the way, is a world heritage site since 1987, the only individual house to receive this honor, to the clock in the entrance hall, to the double doors that can be closed with one hand, to the wine dumbwaiters built into the dining room fireplace, to the beds built into alcoves in the wall, to the device that allowed him to make a copy of a letter while he is writing a letter.

LTL_Spring2020.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

Over three years we conducted a large mixed methods study, consisting of three parts: a national Delphi study of experts in education, regulation and those in practice who work with new graduates; a national quantitative study of five years of BON annual reports of nursing programs; and a national qualitative study of five years of BON site visit documents. Along with these three companion studies, we also conducted a comprehensive literature review, specific to our questions: 1) What are the quality indicators of nursing education programs? and 2) What are the warning signs when programs begin to fall below standards?

Transcript_2019DCM_LKelly.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

And in that case, the argument on the defense side...well, they were actually [inaudible], but what they were arguing was that, because the board had been aware for several months of at least some of the conduct that was involved, that our window for asking for, or seeking, or imposing a summary suspension had passed. So basically, "It's de facto not an emergency because you didn't do anything about it quickly." And so, what our counter-argument was, in that case...like the initial complaint coming in March, but then, we got a subsequent complaint, much later in the year, and the summer suspension was in January.

Transcript_2021NLC_May5.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

Thanks again to the NCSBN marketing team for their vision and support of our work, and please join us next week on May 10 for the Policy Committee presentation, "Follow the Manual." We do have time for questions if anybody would like to type any questions in the chat. And if you have no more questions, I'll just say happy Cinco de Mayo to all of you. - And Ann, if I could just step in for just a second. - Absolutely. - We do have an evaluation we'd like for our members to complete, if you will, and I'm putting it in the chat box. It is very brief. If you will click on the link in the chat box, you'll be able to complete the evaluation, I believe it's three or four questions.

Transcript_2021DCM_bmartin.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

And in some of the multivariable modeling, we also attempted to control for that, and it did not change the nature of our findings. - Okay, thank you. I did a little poll, Brendan, you probably didn't even see this because you're not on Excel events right now. But we popped up a question, do you have someone who monitors all the investigators' caseloads. And just about 26 people answered that, but 96% said, yes, they do have someone who monitors the caseloads. So, that was good to hear. And we certainly could, you know, wish we could have all the positions that all the boards need. We understand state budgets limit some of that.

2023_NCSBN_Annual_Report.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

Kappel, MA Director, Marketing & Communications, Marketing & Advocacy Mitch Karmis Exams Specialist I, Consolidated Services Murat Kasli, PhD Psychometrician I, Measurement & Testing, Examinations Jennifer Keating Meetings Specialist III, Consolidated Services Chelsea Kelley Director, Business Operations Jeff Kendall, MBA Director, Customer Experience Doyoung Kim, PhD Senior Psychometrician, Measurement & Testing, Examinations Michael Kotnaur Director, Marketing & Advocacy Cary Lin, PhD, MS, MA ...

transcript_2024dcm_ptuma.pdf

Site: ncsbn.org

I did sue the District of Columbia Police successfully over a First Amendment issue and changed the law of disorderly conduct in DC, and I, myself, am a long-passion advocate for the First Amendment. I just probably should exercise those rights a little bit more politely sometimes. So, one thing I just want to note here, and I didn't know this, they really are, to their credit, the Institute for Justice, and Paul Sherman, who's a nice enough guy, is honest and upfront about his intentions to do exactly this, to eliminate licensure. He's telling you to his face, he doesn't want licensure for physicians. He doesn't want licensure for dieticians.